The full content of this document is only available to subscribing institutions.
More information can be found via
www.amdigital.co.uk
| Field name |
Value |
| Collection Reference Number
|
GLC00496.163
|
| From Archive Folder
|
Undated Documents Relating to the Post-Revolutionary Era
|
| Title
|
Copy of Alexander Hamilton's opinion on the case of John Innes Clark v. Nathaniel Russell. Transcribed by John Clark and sent to Harrison Otis at his request
|
| Date
|
ca. 30 March 1797-1800
|
| Author
|
Clark, John Innes (1745-1808)
|
| Recipient
|
Otis, Harrison Gray
|
| Document Type
|
Correspondence; Legal document
|
| Content Description
|
Copy of Alexander Hamilton's opinion on the case of John Innes Clark v. Nathaniel Russell at the request of Otis. Transcribed by Clark.
|
| Subjects
|
Law Supreme Court Finance
|
| People
|
Clark, John Innes (1745-1808) Otis, Harrison Gray (1765-1848) Hamilton, Alexander (ca. 1757-1804)
|
| Place written
|
Providence, Rhode Island
|
| Theme
|
Law
|
| Sub-collection
|
The Gilder Lehrman Collection, 1493-1859
|
| Additional Information
|
Clark was a merchant from Providence, Rhode Island. Otis was a state representative from Boston, Massachusetts, who went on to become a state senator, president of Harvard University, and mayor of Boston.
|
| Copyright
|
The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History
|
| Module
|
Settlement, Commerce, Revolution and Reform: 1493-1859
|
| Transcript
|
Show/hide Providence 30th March Dear Sir You expressed a desire to have a copy of Genl. Hamilton's opinion in the case of Nathl. Russell vs me - It is now enclosed, tho' I have thought it unnecessary to repeat the letters, convinced that you have them sufficiently on your mind. With respects to Mrs. Otis & in hopes this will find your child in better health, I am with sentiments of esteem - Your much obliged & most Obed Servant John Innes Clark [2] The agent of Mess. R. M. & Co. delivered the first letter to N. R. Esqr. & made purchases of produce. - to pay for which he drew Bills on London, which Bills were Endorsed by N. R. Esqr. The Bills were returned protested for non payment, but without ever having been protested for non acceptance. - but due notice was given to them of the protest for non payment. Query Do the terms of the Letters constitute a guaranty and if so are C & N holden to pay the Bills so returned. Answer - I do not consider the two letters taken together as constituting a guaranty, and I perceive nothing in the subsequent Statement to affect the Question. - As the guaranty of C & N if it existed at all, would be collateral to the transaction of the Bills. Notice to them of the protest for non acceptance or non payment was not requisite. - It would be sufficient if regular notices were given to R. M. & Co the Drawers. But another point was stated in Conversation which is more material. It is this that N R never advised C & N of the operation he made with R. M. & Co - I am much inclined to think that this was necessary and that the not having done it would be deemed a waver of the guaranty, if one had existed. - I have not however a decided opinion on this point, especially as I recollect no judicial decision that looks to it. - But I am clear that the letters do not amount to a guaranty. Signed A Hamilton Question If after the writing of these letters it should appear that one of the partners, not the writer of the Letters, should have expressed himself to this effect, that in his opinion the Letters did import a guarantee - and that the House were bound by them; but this declaration was made subsequent to the credit alleged to have been given on the Letters by N. R. Esqr. - Could such an opinion, so expressed, affect the question of the guaranty? - I [am of opinion] Answer - I am of opinion that this can make no difference Signed - A Hamilton
|
